<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Conspire 2009 Thoughts &#8211; Concluding Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elementalcm.com/2009/04/18/my-conspire-2009-thoughts-concluding-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elementalcm.com/2009/04/18/my-conspire-2009-thoughts-concluding-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Moving Children&#039;s Ministry Forward</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henry Zonio</title>
		<link>http://www.elementalcm.com/2009/04/18/my-conspire-2009-thoughts-concluding-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Zonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elementalcm.com/2009/04/14/my-conspire-2009-thoughts-concluding-thoughts/#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I agree that their problem is the name. If anything, they just need to work on doing more conspiring at the conference and in how they market. If they took more advantage of social media and the ethos behind it, they would truly be conspiring. 
 
Take a look at Orange. What&#039;s that? You have to look it up or hear what it&#039;s all about, but they do a good job with how they brand it. They are consistent with what they are saying and how they say it. 
 
I agree that Conspire has a branding problem, but I don&#039;t necessarily thinks it&#039;s the name. They just have to follow through with what the name implies and what they are saying they want to happen. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know if I agree that their problem is the name. If anything, they just need to work on doing more conspiring at the conference and in how they market. If they took more advantage of social media and the ethos behind it, they would truly be conspiring. </p>
<p>Take a look at Orange. What&#039;s that? You have to look it up or hear what it&#039;s all about, but they do a good job with how they brand it. They are consistent with what they are saying and how they say it. </p>
<p>I agree that Conspire has a branding problem, but I don&#039;t necessarily thinks it&#039;s the name. They just have to follow through with what the name implies and what they are saying they want to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://www.elementalcm.com/2009/04/18/my-conspire-2009-thoughts-concluding-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elementalcm.com/2009/04/14/my-conspire-2009-thoughts-concluding-thoughts/#comment-638</guid>
		<description>I think Conspire lost branding with the name &quot;Conspire&quot; - had to look it up to see what it was first time i saw it. poor name, doesn&#039;t reflect what it is. i think their branding is suffering and makes it hard to get what it is about. not a big critism, just think the name is a poor name. I attended in 2007 and enjoyed it, but wasn&#039;t wowed. the worship, ironically, was my favorite thing. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Conspire lost branding with the name &quot;Conspire&quot; &#8211; had to look it up to see what it was first time i saw it. poor name, doesn&#039;t reflect what it is. i think their branding is suffering and makes it hard to get what it is about. not a big critism, just think the name is a poor name. I attended in 2007 and enjoyed it, but wasn&#039;t wowed. the worship, ironically, was my favorite thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
